We have 7 kinds of ''cleverness''. Sportive, Matematic, Moral, etc. (don't remember all)
How can we consider the measurement of the Moral one accurate? I am not even talking in terms of moral relativism. Not at all.
For example, when we look at guys as Machiavel, who was in my opinion the biggest name of the utilitarianism, and always refer to moral values as being something superficial and unnecessary. He is not just arguing against one moral position, he's basically saying: all the moral positions are wrong. When he is affirming that he is also taking a moral position-decision.
So, considering the criterias of defining ''moral smartness'', would he be a genius of morality, or would he be the dumbest person ever on it?
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário